NEW vs OLD – Part 1

An exploration of ‘new-niche’ vehicles and their true ancestors.

fr1

BMW’s new 5-series GT explores the higher H-point flexible hatchback concept, though it’s referred to as a sportback rather than hatchback – but way back in 1965 there was the Renault 16.  These two cars are closer in concept than you might think. Sure, the BMW packs a sophisticated powertrain and uses top-quality materials to command a premium price-tag; give or take £40K for the base version (though it ain’t exactly spartan), whereas the R16 was an eminently affordable mainstream vehicle from a fairly dull OEM. Indeed, taking a look at the upright, almost matronly styling of the Renault, you may surpress a chuckle. But wait! There was more innovation packed into this car than you might think…..

3475596961_b9a5a3c6a5_o

The Renault 16 was launched in 1965, with a very astute brief; to combine the practical space of a station-wagon with the refinement and driving qualities of a sedan. In America the R16’s tag-line was ‘The first alternative to the station wagon”. The premise was that with an estate car you very rarely used the full space potential,  usually hauling around a large amount of heavy air behind you, whereas a 4-door sedan meant a limited load-carrying potential:

69renault16sedan

This Canadian ad explains the form-follows-function mantra of the R16 well;

2233328131_028dc181be_b

While a German ad shows the myriad of seating layouts possible;

germanad

The  R16’s designer, Philippe Charbonneaux, (who was involved in the original Corvette design) gave the car a pronounced ‘beak’ and a purposeful stance, with a distinctly fastback rear end.

Front

r16

This was a well equipped car (bear in mind we’re talking the 60’s) . The list of features that were game-changing includes; front disc brakes, a steering-column-mounted gear-lever (to free up floor space), front seats that folded flush with the rears for a make-shift bed, rear seats that tilted and folded forwards for maximum load space, and of course, the rear hatchback. To complete the transformation from workhorse to refined autoroute cruiser, the TX version was awash with luxuries; alloys, central-locking, electric windows, 5-speed gearbox, integrated roof spoiler, and piercing Hella foglights, burning brightly  in Euro-yellow;

489728167_78d37ff282_b

By the time the R16 had finished production in 1980, pretty much every OEM in Europe had a C/D segment hatchback in their range. It spawned most oviously the Austin Maxi, but also the GM’s Cavalier, Ford’s Sierra hatch, the VW Passat hatch and countless others.

Whereas the BMW 5GT confuses me. It’s offering answers to questions nobody asked; a 5m-long hatchback with a trick tailgate, urban un-friendly because of its sheer size, and out of the reach of most consumers.  But it’s not even remotely sporting, either. It comes across as a car conceived by a marketing department – to fill a niche that no-one else is currently offering, necessary or not.. Like the similarly-conceived Mercedes R-Class, I have a suspicion that it’ll end up as a curiosity; innovation for innovation’s sake?…

Advertisements

6 comments

  1. Danny Chhang · July 9, 2009

    Very interesting post. Could the release of the all these confusing cars be the reason Chris Bangle called quits so suddenly? The 5 Series GT, X1 and X6 all puzzle me. What direction is BMW trying to go with these models?

  2. The Face · July 9, 2009

    Thanks Danny. You could be on to something with Chris Bangle’s departure timing…I was always under the impression that he had ultimate veto over design strategy, but with the profusion of niche models it looks as though the planners had the upper hand. Bearing in mind the audacity of his earlier successes, I can’t believe that Chris wanted to end his career with the 5GT.
    As for where they’re going, I really don’t know! There’s talk of the citi-car. The X-series I don’t get. The X6M is in no way a true M-car. It almost feels like there’s a 1980’s mindset at the company where flash and brash are winning out over muscular subtlety; it all feels a little outdated.

  3. Matt Cotton · May 14, 2010

    Bravo! Nice article. The white car in NJ is mine, and I’m always looking forward to meeting new Renault 16 friends!
    See you at Carlisle next week?
    Matt Cotton
    Lake Parsippany, NJ

    • Richard.Allen. · July 23, 2010

      Hi. from England Fantastic to see a R16 in the U.S.A. looks really great.Your car has round headlights all cars in Europe were rectangular of course.Why did american cars have round lights? I have two R16 s 1970 266,000 miles on that and 1966 [oldest in U.K.] Regards Richard.Allen. Rothwell Kettering U.K.

  4. Pingback: La R16 inspire BMW ? - Site Jimdo de seizebreizh!
  5. Pingback: Renault 16 blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s